Evaluation of a clinical communication programme for perioperative and surgical care practitioners.
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION Communication is integral to clinical work. This paper describes a communication programme (CP) designed for two new professional roles. Training in communication is often focused on interactions with patients. Equally important is supporting clinicians to communicate with each other. The authors devised a CP for perioperative specialist and surgical care practitioners. METHODS The CP spanned the broader training programme. The evaluation combined trainees' self-ratings, value of educational methods, summative assessments, written reflections and focus groups. RESULTS The CP was offered over three consecutive years (29 trainees) and showed a progressive increase in trainees' satisfaction. Educational methods were valued. Trainees appreciated the close alignment of CP content and work. Some trainees initially placed little value on learning communication, since they were already experienced clinicians. The CP was perceived to be competing with topics of greater importance. As trainees progressed, all recognised the benefits and valued the opportunity for protected time to focus on commonly used skills. Trainees reported increased awareness and ability in patient-centred and other professional communications. Most trainees were successful in summative assessments. Faculty observations noted benefits accruing from increased alignment of content with clinical practice. DISCUSSION Trainees responded positively to an experiential CP underpinned by education and communication theory. The opportunity for distributed learning enabled trainees to consolidate learning. The balance of teaching patient- and colleague-focused communication was successful. The framework of this CP is applicable to trainees in medical and other health professional roles.
منابع مشابه
An interprofessional training course in crises and human factors for perioperative teams
Improving patient safety and the culture of care are health service priorities that coexist with financial pressures on organisations. Research suggests team training and better team processes can improve team culture, safety, performance, and clinical outcomes, yet opportunities for interprofessional learning remain scarce. Perioperative practitioners work in a high pressure, high-risk environ...
متن کاملTranslation of guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations-2019 update
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is now firmly established as a global surgical quality improvement initiative that results in both clinical improvements and cost benefits to the healthcare system. ERAS guidelines are based on the highest quality evidence available and as such require updating on a regular basis. The ERAS Gynecologic/Oncology guidelines were first published in...
متن کاملPrivate Practitioners’ Perspectives on Their Involvement With the Tuberculosis Control Programme in a Southern Indian State
Background Public and private health sectors both play a crucial role in the health systems of low- and middleincome countries (LMICs). The tuberculosis (TB) control strategy in India encourages the public sector to actively partner with private practitioners (PPs) to improve the quality of front line service delivery. However, ensuring effective and sustainable involvement of PPs constitutes a...
متن کاملEvaluation of a Care Programme with Example of Poliomyelitis in Iran
ABSTRACT Surveillance is the ongoing process of collection, analyzing, interpreting and feedback of the health outcomes data. This health programme like every other programs should be assessed for improving. This study is performed in five provinces of Iran to assess the acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance by the quantitative and qualitative methods. During the 3 years (1996- 1998) 2...
متن کاملUniversal Access to Surgical Care and Sustainable Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case for Surgical Systems Research; Comment on “Global Surgery – Informing National Strategies for Scaling Up Surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa”
National level experiences, lessons learnt from the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) era coupled with the academic evidence and proposals generated by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) together with the economic arguments and recommendations from the World Bank Group’s “Essential Surgery” Disease Control Priorities (DCP3) publication, provided the impetus for political commitment...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Quality & safety in health care
دوره 19 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010